Validation of a prognostic model for predicting larynx preservation outcome (TALK score) in a Southern European population

Objective Larynx preservation is the current standard for locally advanced (LA) laryngeal/hypopharyngeal tumors, but not all patients respond as expected. TALK score model measures four variables (T-staging, albumin levels, liquor consumption and Karnofsky score) to determine which cases are best suited to preservation treatment scheme. We aimed to validate this prognostic model in a Southern European population. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 175 patients diagnosed from July 2008 to December 2015 with LA laryngeal/hypopharyngeal carcinoma and treated with a laryngeal preservation scheme comprising induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. We applied the TALK score model to predict larynx preservation rate. Results Of the 175 patients evaluated, 96.6% were men, 98.3% were smokers and 77.1% misused alcohol. Tumors were laryngeal 66.3% vs 33.7% in hypopharynx, and all were either stage III (37.7%) or stage IV (62.3%). TALK prognostic subgroups were: good risk 40.0%; intermediate risk 52.5%; and poor risk 7.5%. With a median follow-up of 40.1 months, larynx preservation rate, laryngectomy-free survival and overall survival at 3 years was 84.5%, 63.7% and 68.2%, respectively. Although TALK score was not predictive of 3-year larynx preservation rate (good risk 85.5%; intermediate risk 83.1%; poor risk 91.6%), it was predictive of 3-year overall survival (good risk 81.9%; intermediate risk 62.9%; poor risk 33.5%) and 3-year laryngectomy-free survival (good risk 75.6%; intermediate risk 59.6%; poor risk 30.7%) Conclusion TALK model could predict OS and laryngectomy-free survival, helping clinicians to decide which patients should avoid laryngeal preservation and undergo laryngectomy after diagnosis (AU)

Validation of a prognostic model for predicting larynx preservation outcome (TALK score) in a Southern European population.

OBJECTIVE: Larynx preservation is the current standard for locally advanced (LA) laryngeal/hypopharyngeal tumors, but not all patients respond as expected. TALK score model measures four variables (T-staging, albumin levels, liquor consumption and Karnofsky score) to determine which cases are best suited to preservation treatment scheme. We aimed to validate this prognostic model in a Southern European population. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 175 patients diagnosed from July 2008 to December 2015 with LA laryngeal/hypopharyngeal carcinoma and treated with a laryngeal preservation scheme comprising induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. We applied the TALK score model to predict larynx preservation rate. RESULTS: Of the 175 patients evaluated, 96.6% were men, 98.3% were smokers and 77.1% misused alcohol. Tumors were laryngeal 66.3% vs 33.7% in hypopharynx, and all were either stage III (37.7%) or stage IV (62.3%). TALK prognostic subgroups were: good risk 40.0%; intermediate risk 52.5%; and poor risk 7.5%. With a median follow-up of 40.1 months, larynx preservation rate, laryngectomy-free survival and overall survival at 3 years was 84.5%, 63.7% and 68.2%, respectively. Although TALK score was not predictive of 3-year larynx preservation rate (good risk 85.5%; intermediate risk 83.1%; poor risk 91.6%), it was predictive of 3-year overall survival (good risk 81.9%; intermediate risk 62.9%; poor risk 33.5%) and 3-year laryngectomy-free survival (good risk 75.6%; intermediate risk 59.6%; poor risk 30.7%). CONCLUSION: TALK model could predict OS and laryngectomy-free survival, helping clinicians to decide which patients should avoid laryngeal preservation and undergo laryngectomy after diagnosis.

Angiosarcoma primario y secundario de mama: estudio de 8 casos con evidencia de origen linfático en los angiosarcomas posradioterapia / Primary and secondary angiosarcoma of the breast. A study of 8 cases with evidence of a lymphatic origin in post-radiation angiosarcomas

Objetivo. Analizar las diferencias entre los angiosarcomas primarios y posradioterapia de mama. Pacientes y métodos. Revisamos retrospectivamente angiosarcomas de mama entre los años 2000 y 2010. Realizamos un estudio clinicopatológico e inmunohistoquímico con CKAE1/AE3, CD31, CD34, Ki-67, D2-40. Resultados. Se incluyeron 8 mujeres, 4 con angiosarcomas primarios y 4 secundarios. La edad media era de 66 años en los primarios y de 74 en los secundarios. El periodo de latencia medio posradioterapia en los angiosarcomas secundarios fue de 118 meses. Tres tumores secundarios afectaban la piel, 3 angiosarcomas primarios eran intraparenquimatosos y los 2 restantes fueron mixtos. Todos los casos fueron CD31+/CD34+/CKAE1/AE3−. Los angiosarcomas secundarios expresaron el marcador linfático D2-40, mientras que los primarios eran D2-40−. Conclusiones. Los angiosarcomas secundarios expresan D2-40, mientras que los primarios son negativos para este marcador. Ello evidencia un origen vascular linfático para los angiosarcomas posradioterapia (AU)

Objective. To analyze differences between primary and radiation-associated secondary breast angiosarcomas. Patients and methods. We retrospectively reviewed all cases of angiosarcoma diagnosed at our hospital between 2000 and 2010. We analyzed the clinical and pathological features. In the immunohistochemical study, we assessed expression of CKAE1/AE3, CD31, CD34, Ki-67 and D2-40. Results. There were 8 women, 4 with primary angiosarcoma and 4 with secondary angiosarcoma. The mean age at presentation was 66 years for primary tumors and 74 years for secondary angiosarcomas. The mean latency period for radiation-associated angiosarcomas was 118 months. Three secondary tumors involved the skin, 3 primary angiosarcomas were intramammary and the remaining 2 were mixed. All tumors were CD31+/CD34+/CKAE1/AE3−. The secondary angiosarcomas also expressed D2-40, while the primary tumors were negative for this lymphatic marker. Conclusions. Secondary angiosarcomas express D2-40, while primary angiosarcomas are negative for this lymphatic marker. This finding suggests a lymphatic origin for post-radiation angiosarcomas (AU)

The expression of epidermal growth factor receptor results in a worse prognosis for patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy: a multicenter, retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is observed in 50-70% of colorectal carcinoma and is associated with poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of EGFR status before radiotherapy in a group of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-seven patients were studied retrospectively. Treatment consisted of pelvic radiotherapy, in 50 patients with concomitant chemotherapy and surgical resection. Immunohistochemistry for EGFR was determined at the preradiation biopsy and in the resected specimens. Immunohistochemical analysis for EGFR expression was evaluated according to extension and staining intensity. We defined positive staining (EGFR positive), when extension was 5% or more. RESULTS: A total of 52 of 87 tumors showed EGFR positive status at biopsy (60%) and EGFR expression was associated neither with clinical tumor stage nor with clinical nodal stage. EGFR positive expression was linked to a lack of pathologic complete response to preoperative radiotherapy (P=0.006). Disease-free survival was lower among patients with EGFR positive status before radiotherapy (P=0.003). In a multivariate analysis EGFR expression at biopsy was a statistically significant predictor of disease-free survival, RR=2.88(1.1-7.8), P=0.036. CONCLUSIONS: EGFR is expressed in a significant number of rectal tumors. EGFR-positive expression before radiotherapy is an indicator for poor response and low disease-free survival.

Epidermal growth factor receptor is a predictor of tumor response in locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression is observed in 50%-70% of colorectal carcinomas and is associated with poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to determine the EGFR expression rate in locally advanced rectal cancer and to analyze whether EGFR expression predicts tumor response to preoperative radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between December 1997 and October 2000, 45 patients were included. Treatment consisted of preoperative pelvic radiotherapy and, in 21 patients, 2 courses of 5-fluorouracil leucovorin. Surgical resection was performed 4-8 weeks later. Immunohistochemistry for EGFR was determined at the preradiation diagnostic biopsy and in the resected specimens. Immunostaining was performed using EGFR monoclonal antibody (Biogenex, MU 207-UC). Immunohistochemical staining was evaluated according to extension and intensity. We defined positive staining (EGFR+) as extension of 5% or more. RESULTS: Preoperative treatment resulted in pathologic complete remission in 7 patients (15%), downstaging in 13 patients (29%), and no response in 25 patients (56%). EGFR+ was observed in 29 of 45 tumors (64%) and was associated with neither clinical tumor stage nor clinical nodal stage. The overall response rate was 34% in EGFR+ patients vs. 62% in those who were EGFR- (p = 0.07). Only 1 of the 7 pathologic complete remission patients was EGFR+ (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: EGFR is expressed in a significant number of locally advanced rectal tumors. EGFR expression is an indicator for poor response to preoperative radiotherapy in advanced rectal carcinoma.